News
Sreelakshmi H K
March 2, 2026
2
Min
Read

Iran and the Strait of Hormuz Disruption: List of Vessels Affected and What's Next for Ocean Supply Chains

The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz is disrupting container shipping across lanes. Here's a live spreadsheet of impacted vessels to help shippers assess exposure and respond proactively.
Iran and the Strait of Hormuz Disruption: List of Vessels Affected and What's Next for Ocean Supply Chains

The conflict in the Middle East has led to the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting containerized shipping and supply chains across the Gulf and Asia-Europe routes. Carriers are suspending bookings and rerouting vessels, resulting in longer transit times, added costs, and growing risk exposure for shippers. We recommend that shippers monitor carrier advisories, and prepare for schedule and rate volatility.

This update focuses on what has happened so far, disruptions to containerized trade due to the Strait of Hormuz situation, and a live spreadsheet link with information on the container vessels impacted.

Effective Closure of the Strait of Hormuz: How Ocean Freight Has Been Impacted So Far

The Strait of Hormuz disruption has resulted in large-scale hesitation and course reversals across the container shipping industry, rather than a complete halt of all marine activity.

Vessels en route to or from the Persian Gulf began making U-turns within hours of the Hormuz Strait closure announcement. AIS data captured dozens of container vessels halting transits or reversing course, including vessels ranging from 700-TEU feeders to 6,700-TEU mid-size carriers.

At the same time, Houthi groups in Yemen have signalled a resumption of attacks on Red Sea shipping, effectively closing off the western approach to the Arabian Peninsula as well. This dual-chokepoint scenario, with the Strait of Hormuz closed to the east and the Red Sea volatile to the west, leaves Gulf-bound cargo with no fast-routing option.

Asia-Europe services that had recently returned to the Suez Canal routing, after more than two years of Cape of Good Hope detours, have reverted to the longer route around Africa. That shift alone adds approximately seven days to transit times on key loops, with cascading effects on vessel schedules, port calls, and equipment availability.

Carrier Advisories and Service Adjustments Following the Hormuz Strait Closure

As of April 7, major carriers have already implemented significant network changes in response to the Strait of Hormuz situation:

Carrier Advisory Update
Maersk In its April 9 advisory (Operational Update 19), Maersk welcomed the April 8 US-Iran ceasefire but is taking a cautious approach — making no immediate changes to services, as full maritime certainty is not yet assured. The carrier will only resume Hormuz transits when security teams deem it 100% safe. Booking restrictions for DG, OOG, and most Gulf ports remain in place, while reefer bookings from Oman (Salalah, Sohar) and the UAE (Khor Fakkan imports) are accepted. Container Yard acceptance at Jebel Ali via Khor Fakkan by truck and rail is now available. A USD 300/container empty PickUp Charge for Jebel Ali applies from April 6, and the global Emergency Bunker Surcharge remains in effect.
MSC (Mediterranean Shipping Company) MSC declared an End of Voyage for all Arabian Gulf-bound shipments (imports and exports), diverting cargo to the nearest safe port at a mandatory USD 800/container deviation surcharge, with all handling and storage costs for the customer's account. All worldwide bookings to the Middle East remain suspended. War Risk Surcharges of USD 2,000/20' and USD 3,000/40' apply from March 5 on trades from the Arabian Peninsula to Sub-Saharan Africa and Indian Ocean Islands. MSC's April 1 advisory updated its Asia–USA/Canada Emergency Fuel Surcharge effective May 1, reaching USD 644/40' to the US East Coast and USD 467/40' to the West Coast.
CMA CGM CMA CGM has issued 11 advisories to date, rerouting all services via the Cape of Good Hope. Import and export bookings were reopened on March 8 via multimodal landbridge corridors through Jeddah, Sohar, Khor Fakkan, Fujairah, and Aqaba. Notably, the CMA CGM Kribi transited the Strait of Hormuz on April 2 after paying Iran's toll — one of the first container vessels to do so during the conflict. An Emergency Conflict Surcharge (ECS) of USD 2,000/20', USD 3,000/40', and USD 4,000 for reefer or special equipment remains in effect, alongside a revised Emergency Fuel Surcharge (EFS) from March 27 and an Inland Emergency Fuel Surcharge (IEFS) from March 23.
OOCL OOCL suspended new bookings to and from Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Iraq, and the UAE effective March 5, with Asia–Jeddah dry cargo exempt as it does not require Hormuz transit. All vessels continue to maintain a 200-nautical-mile exclusion zone around the Strait of Hormuz. A global Emergency Bunker Surcharge (EBS) introduced March 16 is now fully in effect for both non-FMC trades (from March 23) and FMC-regulated trades (from April 13), reviewed every 14 days.

Hormuz Strait Impact: Transshipment Ports

As mainline vessels continue to avoid direct Gulf calls due to the Strait of Hormuz closure, Gulf-bound cargo is likely to be discharged at regional hubs such as Salalah, Sohar, Duqm, Khor Fakkan, and Colombo for feeder relay. This could create bottlenecks at alternative hubs absorbing diverted volumes.

👉 Check Portcast's data providing live insights into traffic spikes at ports due to the situation.

Track the Vessels Impacted by the Strait of Hormuz Disruption in Real Time

To support the logistics and shipping community during this disruption, Portcast has compiled a live spreadsheet tracking vessels likely affected by the Strait of Hormuz closure. The list is updated continuously as the situation evolves.

Use it to assess exposure across your shipments and prioritize outreach to your carriers and forwarders. 

Stay Ahead of Disruption with Predictive Visibility

As the Strait of Hormuz situation evolves, reactive tracking is not enough. Shippers and forwarders need early signals on vessel deviations, port congestion risk, and transit-time impacts before delays materialize.

Portcast provides real-time container tracking, predictive ETAs, and port congestion insights to help teams assess exposure and act faster during disruptions, such as the ongoing Hormuz shipping disruption.

How Portcast Customers Manage Such Disruption Risk

When a disruption of this scale unfolds, the challenge for logistics teams is knowing which shipments are affected, by how much, and what to do next. Broad advisories from carriers tell you what is changing at the network level. What matters operationally is understanding the impact at the shipment level.

Here's how Portcast's Command Center helps customers to isolate exposure and take action during events like the ongoing Strait of Hormuz disruption:

1. Isolate the geography: Start by scoping the impact zone. Filter active shipments by ports or countries of origin, destination, or transshipment hubs within the affected region. This immediately separates the shipments that need attention from those that do not.

Portcast Command Center: Filter active shipments by ports or countries of origin, destination, or transshipment hubs

2. Identify stranded or at-risk containers: Use exception-based filters to find containers that are already showing signs of disruption: idling at a transshipment hub, awaiting final vessel assignment, or sitting beyond normal dwell thresholds. These are the highest-priority shipments.

Portcast Command Center: Applying exception-based filters to identify at-risk containers

3. Quantify expected delays: For containers closest to the disruption zone, pull predictive ETA updates rather than relying on carrier-issued schedules, which tend to lag behind actual vessel movements. This gives the teams and their customers an earlier, more accurate picture of when cargo will actually arrive.

Portcast Command Center: Predictive ETAs and expected delays

4. Drill down for resolution: For shipments that need active intervention, move to the container level. Granular, box-level data supports precise communication with drayage providers, warehouse teams, and end customers, reducing the back-and-forth that typically slows down exception management.

Portcast Command Center: Granular, container-level insights for risk management

For blank sailing risk specifically, a sailing schedules calendar showing upcoming departures by route and carrier helps identify lanes where coverage is thinning before the blank sailing is officially announced, giving teams a window to rebook or adjust.

Portcast Sailing Schedules showing blank sailings during the iran and middle east conflict leading to the closure of the strait of the Hormuz

This kind of structured workflow applies beyond crisis events. Port congestion, blank sailings, carrier equipment shortages, and schedule reliability issues create similar operational and financial exposure on a regular basis. Having a system for isolating, quantifying, and actioning these risks is what separates teams that absorb disruption costs from those that avoid them.

Speak to our team to understand how Portcast can help you navigate such scenarios with greater confidence.

NOTE: This article was originally published on March 2, 2026 and has since been updated with the latest carrier advisories and vessel routing developments.

Our thoughts are with all those affected by the ongoing tensions in the region. We remain committed to providing the shipping and logistics community with timely, accurate information to help navigate these challenging times.

Conclusion

Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Stay up to date with a monthly digest of container shipping news and data insights by Portcast.